Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 4khilles's commentslogin

The heat shield is a bit different, and the reentry profile is a bit different as well.

I suppose "this will be the first time we can test this slightly modified heat shield in the slightly different pressures and temperatures that it will have to endure." isn't quite as eye catching.

With humans on board? Even if they are not necessary for the actual mission?

Yeah, that's what "untested" means in spaceflight.

> that's what "untested" means in spaceflight

Sort of. At a certain threshold, everything is untested. I’d put this closer to modified than untested—the general config was tested in Artemis I and the specific configuration in a variety of ground tests.


I'd say it's tested. It failed. Then they're flying it anyway. Wonderful stuff.

The heat shield on Artemis I didn’t fail in the sense that were there a crew they would have died

It failed testing. What you’re describing is the exact same thinking that destroyed Challenger. The O-rings are leaking, they’re not supposed to do that at all, but they’re not leaking enough to cause a failure....

And the next flight will use a different design. I wonder why?

Artemis II is scheduled for re-entry to Earth on April 10th. That is when the heat shield issue will be the most dangerous.

If it fails and the mission fails with loss of life while knowing it went ahead despite the IG report about the heat shield... It might be the end of NASA.

Hopefully it will return safely.


> It might be the end of NASA

If idiots and emotions rein, maybe. Then the centre of gravity for space exploration correctly shifts to Musk and China.


For manned spaceflight, I'd say it already has. NASA itself has launched a grand total of one manned flight since July 2011. China has launched 14 and SpaceX has launched 20. Worse, the NASA vehicle is completely unsustainable. It was obsolete before it ever flew and it's so expensive that the mission launched yesterday likely costs more than the entire R&D cost of SpaceX's rocket and capsule. Probably China's too.

The problem is that the purpose of NASA's manned spaceflight program isn't to explore space. It's to make the President look good (and I'm not just talking about the current one here) and funnel money to contractors. In that respect it's doing quite well.


The center has already shifted to Musk, SpaceX is 83% of global lift capacity. Artemis is flying an obsolete rocket at insane cost, and higher risk.

I mean, sure. But that's like equipping a sub with a screen door and claiming that in the grand scheme of things, it's a slightly different door with slightly different permeability characteristics.

No, both Garrett Reisman and Andrej Karpathy worked for Elon for more than 5 years.


Karpathy worked for Tesla for 5 years and a matter of weeks. So you're technically correct, which is of course the worst sort of correctness.


Alpine's great. My entire homelab runs on it. Only complaint I have is its IPv6 support sucks. I have to hack together a bunch of scripts to get a reasonable network configuration.


I had no trouble with IPv6. For static config i add it to /etc/network/interfaces, for dynamic config i use dhcpcd without issues.


Do you have a source on Microsoft employing GKH? First time I've heard of it.


Apologies, I mixed up gregkh (Linux Foundation) with Sasha Levin (Microsoft), https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/26/2

DirectX on Linux, https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/19/742



Since 2021. During the 2020 thread posted above, he worked at Microsoft.

Other MS contributors to LKML: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=microsoft.com


I think their auto-scaling is somewhat broken currently. I set up auto-scaling with min=2 and max=6, and my VMs aren't scaling down from 3 to 2 even though there are 0 active connections on all the VMs.


In what world is 42% yoy growth in deliveries stagnant?


In this world? Their share price assumes > 200% annual YoY growth for the next 6-8 years at least. Stock price is down 15% in the last 5 days (GOOG up 4%, META up 4%, F (ford) up 2%: not a general market movement) so the market seems to agree with me?


I think a species of 7.8 billion individuals can afford to do things in parallel.


I guess so, but there are not 7.8B scientists that can develop the next battery or solar breakthrough, which is actually what is needed in a very big way right now.


Highly recommend https://builds.sr.ht. I've been using for ~2 years, never had an issue.


Just recently I found out about sourcehut. The project is refreshing. I don't know if there is something similar in the market but I enjoy how simple and straightforward to use it is.


LMAO, the entire front page of SourceHut is broken.. that's not a good look...


What is broken? Both https://sourcehut.org/ and https://builds.sr.ht/ renders just fine to me.


Looks like it just fixed itself. I wasn't able to see any featured projects & search for any projects for a good 5-10 minutes there.


How is it broken? sr.ht? It seems to work for me...


Probably not the best use of archive resources, but you could store a snapshot of it, so hn commenters can believe you.


No, it's the opposite of your point.


Tossing a federal law “codifying” a federal right to abortion would not make abortion illegal


Good news, you need less than $250. Just buy a Protectli appliance, install OPNSense on it with the wireguard plugin. Setup Mullvad config and route all traffic through the tunnel. That's it!

I've been running a similar setup for a couple years now. It's been great.


Or spend less than $80 on GL.iNet GL-MT1300 travel router

or $90 on GL.iNet GL-AX1800 Wifi-6 router with MullVad support preconfigured.

Nothing to install, tweak or have hassles with.


Or around 50$ for a cheap mikrotik box, though it will struggle with full gigabit routing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: