Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cfelix's commentslogin

For anyone looking for side gigs, are websites still the number one option? Also, it's nice to see that social media has not eaten the whole internet yet.


>Another thing to note is, do these Googlers honestly think Russia and China and others aren't working on the same thing to be used by their military? Are these Googlers actively trying to persuade those countries not to work on this business of war at the same time?

Some people don't want to take part in automated killing. It is not their duty to stop others.


And here they are doing just that.


I worked with health insurance as a software developer (in Brazil so maybe it's all different, but still) and here are my observations.

1. Making claim submission impossible

He said he tried to submit a claim at the last minute. I believe the hidden page was just lazy work, because the page has to be visible again soon. If they hid the page at an appropiate time I don't know.

2. Routinely denying claim submissions

As far as I can tell, in Brazil a regulated health insurance plan can't deny you service based on how many claims of a certain kind you submited. They could before.

But the industry will find other ways to not lose money. Readjust prices based on number claims (from all users), prevent you from entering the plan and making a claim right away, pay for a quota of every procedure you take.

All these mechanisms already existed, but if they can't deny claims anymore they will tweak the other points.

3. Saying the customer has other insurance

This is fucked up. I can't find a explanation that isn't malicious.

Here is one similar case that happens in Brazil though. If you have health insurance and use the free health insurance (SUS). The Union will charge back your plan, not you. It's their job to sort it out not yours.


comparing brazil with the US on health insurance and worker rigths is a joke, you know that, rigth?

even with the latest illegitimate corrupt government killing most of the work laws last couple months, its still way ahead of the US.


I know but I still think the points 1 and 2 are pretty much the same for both countries.


Price is the by far the biggest factor. My friends (here in Brazil) have two or three apps installed and always compare price before making a choice.


I do believe they are capturing microphone data because I can't think of any other explanation for the japanese ads (not about japanese stuff but actually written in japanese) I saw when rewatching my old anime DVDs.

I was watching anime in a old TV without any internet connection and at the same time browsing reddit on my laptop. Things like this make me feel no guilt for using ad-blocks.


I think it might be one of those situations where the microphone data is being captured using some other app and then shared into a data network as tar-getting data, providing a convenient and plausible deniability to Google and Facebook for shady practices.


Not exactly, preferring a diverse group over a homogeneous one doesn't mean that the individuals of the homogeneous group are inferior.

If the goal is to have a diverse group then a group composed only of women isn't ideal either. Diversity is not about raising or lowering the bar.


What if I prefer a homogeneous group then? It doesn't mean that diverse individuals are any worse, does it?


Of course not! I just don't know why someone would want that.


If I ran a debt collecting agency, I'd probably choose men with a Russian-sounding accent over any other group.


For a genetic study of prevalence of a genetic condition in Chinese males, you'd want a homogenous group of Chinese males.


I was referring about hiring people, not studying them. But I can't say you're wrong.


If we really dig for an example - mountain climbing guides for Mount Everest, certain groups of people have evolutionary advantages that make them more suited for the job.

In an extreme environment where advantages of the tail end of population distributions are important then it's less likely the market will choose a diversified workforce.


It's not about being able to make a living, it's about how much do we really need to make a living.


Things seem kind of bimodal there, though. If you're part of a new technology or movement, generally there aren't any stable jobs with retirement plans. So someone has to get entrepreneurial...and then they are CEO.


The day a machine capable of transforming ambiguous and sometimes plain dumb input into code will be the day that developers are replaced.


I wouldn't say that finding a house cleaner is really easy, but once you solve this problem and all goes well you just stick with the same person.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: