Core of the job stays human—AI helps at the edges.

(They (went (to Oregon) (with ((Betty (a maid)) and (a cook))))).

((That (is (the (most natural) syntax))) and ((all (of us)) (should (switch (to it))))).

Many years ago working on natural language to SQL, when we had ambiguities this is how we’d clarify things with the user (albeit with the minimal amount of brackets necessary).

It looks like you might have learned how to diagram a sentence as a youth

It seems you're speaking with a Lisp :P

Or was the nineties, so it would have been a “not!” or a “psych!”

“… on Opposite Day!”

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

Is it open sauce?

I’m sorry.

Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money has turned out to be a myth.

I don't think that's true.

There are a ton of weird coins around, sure, but no-one is using them as money.

I still have to stump up actual dollars backed by a government if I want to buy a coffee.

Guaranteed CVE-free at time of delivery!

Yes at least we can sleep.

So they’re assuming the existence of somebody to be mad at without direct evidence?

No, they're applying statistics.

Some people are literally the worst.

I don’t know which ones specifically, but statistically speaking some must be.

Statistically only one person can literally be the worst, unless you can tie for the position.