I tried to play this game once and sucked at it. There are people out there who are legitimately good at this, and that's awesome to see for an open source game
I know what you mean, biggest gripe I have with this game is how important it is to play the meta and boom early if you want to win at anything other than easy mode.
I've played perhaps tens of hours of 0AD. I boom early, try to create an unbeatable army, and then go win. When I saw competitive 0AD players on YouTube, they played completely differently: they train cavalry or cavalry archers and go hassle the booming opponents really early. Then retreat to go hunt some chickens for a bit, train some more cavalry, and go raiding again. They simultaneously attacked each other, all the while trying to continually improve their economy meanwhile. It seemed much more fun than the way I played tbh.
The best players are incredible at microing (although horse rushs are just one of multiple strategies). It's also equally important to manage resources and units in a way that you use all of them all the time. That's especially important in early game.
I don't see the similarity between your comment and the point I was making.
When a very successful long term investor buys a long term investment it can be a notable signal of the merit of the investment.
But if anyone sells an investment (absent of a credible explanation why) it doesn't say anything about the merit of the investment.
Further, if insiders (board, execs) buy shares in the company they are running that's a positive signal. It the majority of insiders sell shares that is a bearish signal. If one important insider (e.g. CEO, founder, etc) sells shares, that on its own doesn't really mean anything, because one person/entity could be selling shares for any of many different reasons.
One more nuance... When warren buffet sold off some airlines, and then later I think he sold Morgan Stanley or some other bank stock, and he explained in shareholder meeting (and probably some reports) why he sold these (unsustainable business practices) that is a valid bear signal.
So really it's when someone sells, and they don't explain why they sold, or their explanation has a conflict of interest, then the sale is not a meaningful signal.
I don't like to assume the worst of people, but the fact this website lists its own browser as the #1 AI browser makes me wonder if this is just an advertisement disguised as a list of AI browsers.
This happens with spice too. You develop a tolerance to it. I don't think this is abnormal, and the specific mention of MSG as opposed to just umami in general makes me think this is more MSG fearmongering.
So I was curious about the privacy implications of this, so I scrolled down to the bottom of the webpage to see if there was a Privacy Policy.
As I feared, there isn't.
The notion of giving a company I have never heard of my email address and phone number to do who knows what with it, that's a bit scary.
I know that the social media websites I use will sell my data and how they will. They have privacy policies that detail that. But this doesn't, and until it does, I strongly recommend that people refrain from using it.
It's easy to remember the URL too.