Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | flyaway123's commentslogin

Some motion due to wind, in another video: https://youtu.be/_B9hkn6wgNA?feature=shared&t=24


For aviation, I believe the fact that the "driver"'s life is at stake helps (also consider the perspective of the passengers). Comparing that to the imbalance between the drivers in a protective shell and the pedestrians on the road.


So drivers need more skin in the game. Perhaps amputation of a limb as a punishment for grievous injury / death of a pedestrian.


> 1984 -> 1994 -> 2006 -> 2020

Next architecture transition will be happening in 2036?


They omitted the 6502 in 1976, which adds another point on your line


Quick, you can dub it flyaway123’s law.


In accordance with The Prophecy.


> Uncaught (in promise) FirebaseError: Messaging: This browser doesn't support the API's required to use the Firebase SDK. (messaging/unsupported-browser).

One of the console messages.


It kinda does this if it doesn't jump and the non-changing digits are 0, 1, or 8 due to its physics.

Felt quite different as I stumbled upon this when it was 00:00:01.


Thanks for sharing.

On a side note, I find it quite curious how the resolution on this image from WAttention [1] mismatches. From the OP, the couple portrait attributed to Wikipedia, which is the latest 2018 retouched version [2], has a much higher resolution and specifies @Press as the source. The 2016 original version [3] matches the couple portrait on @Press [4], which has the same blueish hue and the additional artifacts. This links back to Nakamuraya's website itself [5], which has the same food photo combination as [1], but in consistent resolution.

At first, it seems to me that the couple portrait on [1] was (intentionally?) degraded because of the different lighting than [5], and the food photo is simply another version that was available during the retrieval (notice the crop). On second thought, it could have simply been another version that was available from Nakamuraya's. TIL images uploaded to Wikipedia are encouraged to be enhanced [6].

I wonder, as AI tools getting more pervasive, how many variations with artificial details will exist due to constant upscaling/downsizing? (Accurate replication might not be important in certain contexts, but I imagine artificial details will eventually leak into the chain of reference)

Of course, old photos like this are scanned/photographed into digital format in the first place.

[1]: https://wattention.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Shinjuku-N...

[2]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Rash_Beh...

[3]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/f/f5/...

[4]: https://www.atpress.ne.jp/releases/104283/img_104283_8.jpg

[5]: https://www.nakamuraya.co.jp/common/img/top/pavilion_img07.p...

[6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_improve_image...


Comment from the author:

"Ted, the change I suggest doesn't affect the independence of your sessions as you suggest. Each shell maintains a unique history in memory so modifying the history file has no affect on running terminals. The only time the history file is read is when you start a new terminal. I recommend you try my suggestion. Really, all I am doing is eliminating the race condition that causes the bash history file to have inconsistent data.

Thanks for the feedback."


Exactly this.

If you do want to load the history persisted from other shells into the current one, all you have to do (if memory serves) is:

    $ history -r



I hate lightbulbs... I have light sensitivity and it makes me hurt literally, and it destroys the ecosystem. Please take out that icon :(


Thanks


E Corp


"Your house, my rules."

Is this what you are suggesting?


If someone's house rules are so strict that nobody wants to hold game night there, yet this person loves playing in other people's (far less restrictive) homes, how long before we stop inviting them?


You don't invite friends to your home just because his/her mom has strict rule in their home?


In terms of adult game nights (or potlucks, parties, etc.), the standard etiquette is everyone takes a turn playing host (since there is some cost incurred/liabilities playing host).

Would you feel entitled to attending such social gatherings, even if your house rules are so vastly different than everyone else's they dissuade anyone from coming?

Also, anthropomorphizing, China is not my friend. More like arch rival, perhaps even nemesis. Canada can come over whenever.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: