It's a creative project in which I add a new room to a mega-dungeon over the course of a year, resulting in 12 levels and approximately 30 rooms per level at the end. All the tiles are created by me using my own tools. It's a lot of fun and something I can do every day that I feel like I can enjoy for a year.
It's focused on OSR/Shadowrun. It's also taught me a lot about dungeon design and creation.
"According to an F.B.I. affidavit the panel highlighted ... a government informant said that members of the far-right militant group the Proud Boys told him they would have killed Pence 'if given the chance.' The rioters on January 6th almost had that chance, coming within forty feet of the Vice-President as he fled to safety."
What is your argument? That not every person there was trying to kill Mike Pence?
There sure were a lot of people in that crowd chanting "Hang Mike Pence" but I guess if your point is just that not all of them were doing it then I suppose you're right.
College students posting memes online is not the same as a crowd of people (some armed) forcing their way into a government building chanting "Hang Mike Pence" knowing that Mike Pence was inside.
If you don't understand the difference between a credible, immediate threat to someone's life and someone posting a meme online you're too uninformed to be having this conversation and I won't be responding further.
I wouldn't bother. denuoweb2 is trying to circumvent bans or something I don't know by creating second accounts or more. I don't know why or maybe they know they are losing karma or something, I don't know, but they are lying and acting 100% like a troll. I wouldn't engage and just flag them. They aren't worth investing time or energy in.
It was a riot and attack on the capitol in support of an attempt to overturn a legitimate election result. Isn't that bad enough? Why do you have to lie and claim that it was an assassination attempt on Mike Pence?
I think this is a good explanation, and even if this isn't what the OP says, I see arguments like this frequently.
In the case of copyright, think of it as anti-current-implementation of copyright rather than anti-copyright. For example, you could oppose the current copyright term, but that doesn't mean you are anti-copyright. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Do these scripts need to be productionised? I prefer working in an environment where efficient sharing of knowledge and solutions is encouraged, rather than framed as a burden of responsibility.
Given the choice between starting with an almost-working script or starting from scratch, I’ll take the former, it might save a few hours.
My colleagues and I don’t do this 100% of the time, but I never regret it and always appreciate it when others do.
Yeah, some of it can be solved as a simple naming convention thing. `_scripts/*.ts` for scripts that are "reproduceable" and/or production-ready and `_scripts/scratch/*.ts` or `_scripts/${username}/*.ts` for scripts that are piecemeal or work-in-progress or user-specific or otherwise "throwaway". Or a graduation process such as where things in `_scripts/` are considered "throwaway" until added to and documented in a larger production task runner like adding them to the "tasks" section of a deno.json file. (They graduate from being shebang run to `deno task taskname` run. They get basic documentation in the `deno task` list and various IDE integrations of such.)
The major thing to be concerned about there is leaking things like hard-coded secrets and that's where something like .env files can come in handy and knowing your tools to make use of them. Deno (as the running example) makes using .env files easy enough by adding the `--env` flag to your `deno run` shebang/task-line and then using `Deno.env` like any other environment variable. (Then don't forget to .gitignore your .env files.)
The fairly accurate joke is that the algorithm is really just telling on yourself.
> it was suggesting feeds featuring clearly mentally impaired people with large audiences throwing money at them for saying their name
I've never seen that. I saw D&D content and discussions about gamedev. The feed is what you make of it, and TikTok's very famous algorithm shows you what you signal you will watch.
Feel free to disagree, and maybe you are the very rare exception, but you watched that stuff for a week or so, and I have no idea what you are referring to.
> How is this any different than say, Democratic voters who want medicare for all (or whatever) and not getting that for decades?
They can see progress. ACA wasn't a slam dunk, but it was progress.
Also, you aren't voting for a Republican or a Democrat, you are voting for a person, and if the person you are voting for supports M4A, that's what you can do. If someone else in the same party doesn't support that, you can't do anything about that. However, your representative is one piece of the puzzle. Giving up on that is dumb.
It's not like the Democrats are under the heels of a tyrant leading their party and country over a cliff.
> I think there are effectively universal moral standards, which essentially nobody disagrees with.
...
> I don't think you are using "torture" in the same sense as I am.
Just throwing this out here, you haven't even established "Universal Moral Standards", not to mention needing it to do that across all of human history. And we haven't even addressed the "nobody disagrees with" issue you haven't even addressed.
I for one can easily look back on the past 100 years and see why "universal moral standards, which essentially nobody disagrees with" is a bad argument to make.
That means exactly what I thought it meant. It's still just as bad.
reply