Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johndhi's commentslogin

Er wait is retinal cancer a thing?

Yes. Like OP, I do a picture every year. Three years ago there was a scare, that turned out to be nothing.

Retinal imaging is used to detect damage from glaucoma or other eye disease, by "diffing" the fine blood vessels and nerves.

Family history of glaucoma and macular degeneration. Also had a semi detached retina when I was a kid.

Yes. You can also have melanoma on your uvea

theres a ton of degeneative stuff too that's not strongly age corrilated.

love it - is this a thing that's mostly used in government contracting, or do people encounter SBOM stuff more broadly than that?

I review an SBOM 3 days out of the week before lunch. If you can source your butter and cheese from the same dairy repo you can reduce the overhead of a grilled cheese by about 20%.

You can encounter it when someone is doing due diligence while buying software company.

Also it is now hot topic because of CRA in EU.


he was convicted of soliciting prostitution (not of minors), right?

why do we assume that the people he was hanging out with knew the details of what he did wrong?


This article was on the front page recently: https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9534

So at least some lay people easily realized he wasn't worth getting involved with.


good call! hadn't read that.

He was arrested for sex trafficking minors and convicted procuring a child for prostitution.

He ran a sex-trafficking ring that involved hundreds of girls and women. Possibly over a thousand. He wasn't keeping it all to himself.

> not of minors, right?

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1180481...

"The victims described herein were as young as 14 years old at the time they were abused by Jeffrey Epstein... Epstein intentionally sought out minors and knew that many of his victims were in fact under the age of 18, including because, in some instances, minor victims expressly told him their age."

> why do we assume that the people he was hanging out with knew the details of what he did wrong?

Some of them were emailing long, long after his conviction.


that's a grand jury charge, not what he actually pled to, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein

> Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute.


He pled to Procuring Person under 18 for Prostitution.

I could be wrong and would be happy to be so but it seems like this to me:

If someone did a few months of house arrest for "pleading guilty to solicitation of prostitution involving a minor" it would be incredibly easy for that person to say - whoops, she said she was 25 and then they threw the book at me." And not terribly unreasonable for someone to take him at his word on that.

The real crime is that the prosecutors massively under charged him for doing an insane gigantic awful pedophile recruitment ring. No one really knew that til a long time later.


But can't computers play several hundred thousand poker hands easily in a couple of hours ?

Sorry to be this person, but I don't really agree with the first sentence:

--> "Civic institutions—the rule of law, universities, and a free press—are the backbone of democratic life."

People are the backbone of our civilization. People who have good intentions and support one another. We don't NEED an FDA to function -- it's just a tool that has worked quite well for a long time for us.


The problem is that not all people have good intentions. That's why we actually need the FDA, or something like it.


There are a lot of tools to address the problem that some people have bad intentions.

We publish common sense laws, and we have police officers and prosecutors, and then we have a court system to hold people accountable for breaking the law. That's one pretty major method that has little to do with the need for an institution like FDA.

I don't know if a system that relied entirely on tort and negligence and contract law to protect people from being sold snake oil would function better or worse than FDA, but I do know something like FDA (where a bunch of smart people advise very specifically on which drugs are ok to take and which are not) isn't the only option we have.


as a lawyer, I'll just note that the legal system has standards for this. specifically, you can't delete stuff that poses legal risks to you once you reasonably expect a lawsuit about it. but you can delete it as part of normal business activity until that point.


This is fun though I sort of wonder if it's attacking a straw man. Are there any reconstruction folks who defend these?


Makes sense. This is basically how skilled painters of miniatures (Warhammer) do it.


Yeah, these reconstructions look like tournament-grade paintjobs.


Can you share some prompt examples you use to try to ensure it doesn't get "lazy" and just cherry pick from here and there?

I have a written novel draft and something like a million words of draft fiction but have struggled with how to get meaningful analytics from it.


But added "annually"! That's a lot better!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: