They rarely even provide the projects either or even the type of project. I'd like to see all these awesome results that are build with AI (preferably not web related).
These models could still be useful when rendered. But when animated or in a game probably less so. Maybe as a prototype to get funding and hire an artist.
It's not just about the programmer and his experience with AI tools. The problem domain and programming language(s) used for a particular project may have a large impact on how effective the AI can be.
But even on the same project with the same tools the general way a dev derives satisfaction from their work can play a big role. Some devs derive satisfaction from getting work done and care less about the code as long as it works. Others derive satisfaction from writing well architected and maintainable code. One can guess the reactions to how LLM's fit into their day to day lives for each.
There are many billions of dollars at stake to try and gain momentum. That's just the direct investment from the AI companies. The entire tech sector wants it to succeed so they can save on salary from expensive engineers.
Nobody is preventing the citizens from digging their own well and ensuring their own water supply and having bad teeth.
I like it how when it comes to fluoride in water, that's the nanny state pushing things on people, but when it comes to municipal water, said people can't bother to use their freedom and get their own water supply. It's the same that parents refuse to vaccinate their children for measles and then hurry to the doctors when the child inevitably gets sick. The freedom to die of preventable diseases is a great thing!
