People ruined the word AGI before this to be fair, we will need another word to describe "real AGI" when it comes

I'm using Opus on Claude Code and even on easy tasks, if you not review the changes properly, it creates tech debts. One of the most common issues is replicating the same logic with variables with different names (which makes grep harder to detect on future changes) in multiple places and lack of following project patterns. Even having a lot of .md files instructing to do the opposite. I still didn't find a workflow without human interaction that can be that efficient and reliable.

You should be concerned and not excited. This future might be near than we can imagine and we're just accelerating things without thinking about the consequences.

What specific consequences are you anticipating?

Let me guess. Yeat another bunch of md files trying to fix bad prompts from unskilled programmers?

For me it's so unrelevant reading about how a product is useful on the company itself website. This is at most marketing disguised as research.

Billionaire CEOs have silenced the informed sources of information. We live in a time that everybody knows the opinion of billionaires in every aspect of society (and it is bad) but science and journalism are seen with mistrust.

Marketing and entertainment are supplanting news and knowledge. I hope that the people that is pushing back succeed.

But how do you know if that is really their opinions?

Thanks. My galaxy s23 can't handle this website

a cpu about 1000x as strong as need to beat any human at chess, can't show a simple vibe coded website...

Yeah, it's hard to maintain physical performance as we are more susceptible to injuries which keeps us away from constant training, but our brain doesn't suffer by injuries, what allow us to go further. I think what makes people to drop at advanced age on "non-physical sports" it's to focus on other aspects of life over the sport because it's exaustive, if not impossible, to focus on both.

I'm not doubting of you or anything, but you just proved point above by saying you have a successful project without even mentioning which project is that.

Good article. Nothing is more frustate than reading a text that I don't even know if the person who "wrote" it, actually read it.

If someone wants to me read a giant text generated by a small and poor prompt, I don't wanna read it

If someone wants to fix that by increasing the effort and do a better prompt and express better the ideas, I rather read that prompt over the llm output

The effort to write shitty code is way less when you are using IA, you can create a 1k lines PR with a single prompt. This policy is important because no one is saying "we hate AI" but instead advises developers to use it with responsibility. This is coming in time since many people are using it without understanding problems and not being accountable regarding the contributions.