I agree with the article when it poses that a product should be built because you enjoy doing so and when it becomes a company you should do it to generate revenue and not an exit.
However, it's incoherent that an article that is against the "Go big or go home" philosophy discusses how much your company valuation needs to multiply given you sell X% of shares in T amount of time.
At least in today's macroeconomic context, a company is the best platform to scale something valuable, and investors are there to help with that scaling process.
However, it's incoherent that an article that is against the "Go big or go home" philosophy discusses how much your company valuation needs to multiply given you sell X% of shares in T amount of time.
At least in today's macroeconomic context, a company is the best platform to scale something valuable, and investors are there to help with that scaling process.