I'm a little troubled by your comment. If you disagree so strongly with what James Damore said I think the best course of action is to refute his arguments, rather than attack him personally/his position in life - junior programmer, big deal? Exactly what difference does that make to the validity of his arguments or otherwise? You actually undermine the cause of refuting his position by not focusing solely on his arguments, but rather attacking him and those that might think his ideas are at least worth hearing, even if only to undermine those ideas.