It surprises me how the meaning of the word "compromise" is being devalued.
No net neutrality on wireless networks isn't a compromise.
Net neutrality with some exceptions would be a compromise.
Net neutrality with a ton of exceptions would be a compromise.
Hell, total freedom for carriers with merely the verbal promise to make a bit of an effort towards net neutrality could still qualify as a "compromise".
This proposal isn't a compromise. There's no "practical success" here. It's a complete and utter sell out. Having a "negotiation" about the terms of your surrender doesn't make it less of a surrender.
No net neutrality on wireless networks isn't a compromise.
Net neutrality with some exceptions would be a compromise. Net neutrality with a ton of exceptions would be a compromise. Hell, total freedom for carriers with merely the verbal promise to make a bit of an effort towards net neutrality could still qualify as a "compromise".
This proposal isn't a compromise. There's no "practical success" here. It's a complete and utter sell out. Having a "negotiation" about the terms of your surrender doesn't make it less of a surrender.