You're not wrong, the objective is assumed to be Lipshitz which is continuous. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		alexbeloi on Feb 22, 2018 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: A Global Optimization Algorithm Worth Using You're not wrong, the objective is assumed to be Lipshitz which is continuous.

jefft255 on Feb 22, 2018 [–]

It's actually a stronger assumption than simply being continuous

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact