Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am sure 51-year-old technicians, to take one example from the article, would be well aware of the considerable ageism they'd face in the job market.


A permanent grant of free money from the government is not a solution to ageism.


A decision to void an existing contract isn't either.


I have no sympathy with spurious contracts that involve parties that can't sign or display consent.


Which side can't display consent, the employer or the employee?


The taxpayer that foots the bill.


That is a complete non-sequitur.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: