Ok here's an "argument" version: I argue that it is more likely that these problems were due to taking the wrong side of trade offs based on incomplete knowledge, weak foresight, and poor judgement. I argue that there is little or no evidence that executives or engineers at Intel actively didn't care about their reputation or their customers.

(Somewhat ironically, I think "Hanlon's razor is just a saying, not an argument" is just a saying, not an argument.)