Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> And ARM, and IBM, both the POWER and mainframe/Z teams

Is the point of your argument that others did it too, so Intel shouldn't be accountable?

Or that others did it too, so it's reasonable to believe that the vulns were impossible to prevent?

This argument sounds a lot like the "deflect" part of Facebook's strategy to "delay, deny, deflect".



I'm saying Intel's design decisions are found in so many other vendors, Spectre in all of them I've looked for, that it represents an industry blind spot. Which calls for different kinds of "accountability", unless you're a rent seeker.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: