This article is a hack piece, in my opinion. First, formal qualifications do not a scientist make. Second, using phrases like this, with zero real evidence to support them:
>a distinction that even a someone who has studied a four-week course in the area will know is incorrect.
Regardless of the validity of the 'color' theories, this is not journalism. It is opinion presented as fact.
Full disclosure, I have never bought into colors theories, even though they are currently en vogue in my field. But we need scientific study, not more opinion nonsense.
>a distinction that even a someone who has studied a four-week course in the area will know is incorrect.
Regardless of the validity of the 'color' theories, this is not journalism. It is opinion presented as fact.
Full disclosure, I have never bought into colors theories, even though they are currently en vogue in my field. But we need scientific study, not more opinion nonsense.