Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, that gets into game theory stuff, though. For example, one could say that logically any aggressively expansive intelligent species on that scale should take the position of being friendly and supporting to lesser-advanced intelligent species by default, as a way to encourage other more-advanced species than them to take the same position.

The real danger would be a super but unintelligent race doing the same (think "giant space ants"), since they wouldn't have philosophy department chairs.



Think Rorschach from Blindsight.


Why would that encourage any higher intelligence aliens to do the same?


If you're smart enough to think about it logically, you're probably also smart enough to realize there's always a bigger fish.

The exception would be the fanatically oriented, as acting in opposition to logic is part of the basic premise.


A bigger fish would have already taken over the universe.


The universe is really, really big.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: