Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Then there would be a loophole where you make an independent entity that “makes” something that shields infinite liability. It makes sense to go after all beneficiary owners and parties.


I see. So I guess, assuming appeals don't overturn the decision, then Apple needs to sue Broadcom for damages? I don't see Apple left holding the bag in this. Unless they would rather use it as a stick when negotiating future deals with Broadcom.


You mean like they make shell companies for patents so any adverse judgements don't sink the whole boat? Hell yeah, lets have it then.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: