It releases into the public domain, where possible, and has a paragraph that comes as close as possible to the public domain in jurisdictions where that release isn't possible.
I think the idea in the referenced case is that a release to the public domain means that the author gives up all interest in the work.
Not to really defend Getty Images, which seems to be acting out of line.
It releases into the public domain, where possible, and has a paragraph that comes as close as possible to the public domain in jurisdictions where that release isn't possible.
I think the idea in the referenced case is that a release to the public domain means that the author gives up all interest in the work.
Not to really defend Getty Images, which seems to be acting out of line.