Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Compulsory union membership has been illegal since the 1947 Taft-Hartey Act. Compulsory legal representation fees for public sector unions have been illegal since Janus v. AFSCME (2018).

Just like in a democracy, not everybody's interests can be fully satisfied in a union. So what? That doesn't necessarily mean we'd all be better off with autocracy or without any government whatsoever, not even the people getting the short end of the stick.

The fundamental problem in Santa Cruz, like many other universities in the state, is the cost of housing. UC Santa Cruz didn't build enough housing. Part of the problem is that most of UCSC's land is wildlife refuge, and part of the problem (like everywhere else in California) is the political and regulatory difficulty of building new housing. The cost of housing has been increasing far faster than UCSC's budget.



Unions still have many monopolistic legal rights. For example, one obvious question is why UCSC students can’t form their own union and get their own contract; the answer is that it would be illegal, because if there’s a duly authorized union employers can’t collectively bargain with any other group.


Why couldn't people call a new vote for the new union?


That would also be illegal right now, since it hasn't been 3 years since the union contract was signed.

ref: https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/whats-law/employees/i...


This is not entirely true. UCSC determines its own admission, they could have simply not increased the student body and their housing would have been sufficient.

I know the same thing is happening at UCSD, where the student body exploded in size and despite additional housing being built, it is insufficient and very expensive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: