>You could say the same thing about airlines, but no one is arguing about whether airlines are a necessary component of the economy.
I don't understand - do you mean that airlines are not necessary components of the economy or that they are. And do you mean that cruise ships are or are not necessary components of the economy.
If airlines are necessary and cruise ships are not then it might follow that you should bail out one without bailing out the other.
I don't understand - do you mean that airlines are not necessary components of the economy or that they are. And do you mean that cruise ships are or are not necessary components of the economy.
If airlines are necessary and cruise ships are not then it might follow that you should bail out one without bailing out the other.