Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "just another person's hard drive"

In general I'm with you, but that here is the main benefit imho. I don't have the nerves to operate my own redundant, transparently growing and reliable storage system for my business. For use cases where privacy is important (like backups, private user data, etc), encrypting data before uploading limits the privacy leaks to metadata which might be acceptable.



The tools for doing this at "medium business" and below scale have gotten much easier, especially with things like ZFS.


which is still orders of magnitude harder than create an account and pay a bill


AWS is impressive because they're running everyone's scalable reliable redundant storage server. It's not so scary when you just have to do it for your own small pond.


But you have to build the same level of redundancy and reliability for your small pond if you want to achieve S3's uptime. Scaling is the hardest part, but it's just one part of the puzzle.


Do you really need more than basic redundancy + backups? I think most small businesses would survive a few hours restoring backups every few years.


This assumes backups work.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: