And? They have also redefined violence to mean something else. It doesn't mean they are correct in doing so and in no way does this address my complaint.
In the link you posted the very first line:
> Violence is "the use of physical force so as to injure, abuse, damage, or destroy."
That is the definition and that is what most people think when they hear the term violence. Your link itself says it is a unconventional definition. One that I do not care for.
So both the WHO and this acronym as far as I am concerned is redefining violence.
> That said, I do prefer the AKA of "Compassionate Communication"
Again. This is more newspeak. It just being empathetic. I absolutely abhor people inventing their own terms when there is already suitable word.
And? They have also redefined violence to mean something else. It doesn't mean they are correct in doing so and in no way does this address my complaint.
In the link you posted the very first line:
> Violence is "the use of physical force so as to injure, abuse, damage, or destroy."
That is the definition and that is what most people think when they hear the term violence. Your link itself says it is a unconventional definition. One that I do not care for. So both the WHO and this acronym as far as I am concerned is redefining violence.
> That said, I do prefer the AKA of "Compassionate Communication"
Again. This is more newspeak. It just being empathetic. I absolutely abhor people inventing their own terms when there is already suitable word.