Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Raid-6+ (16, 60, 100, etc), Raid-z2+ (raid-z1 being the equiv of raid-5), Ceph, etc


OK, good to know. So the process of rebuilding after having lost a disk will take less time with those other solutions?


It's not about the process taking less time (even though aiming to reduce that is a valid approach, which is usually tackled by using ssd/flash and not over-provisioning). It's much more about being able to handle a second disk failure during rebuild. With raid 5, if that happens, you are in a world of hurt (think 3k fees to send raid to data recovery place).

I've learnt all this the hard way.


Ah, makes sense. Thanks!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: