Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hours worked for the exploit * 50$ should be enough.


That's silly.

If someone spends 100 hours coming up with, say a clickjacking vuln, it does not magically make it worth $5000. If someone spends 6 minutes coming up with zero-click sandbox bypass in chrome, its not just worth $5.

Severity matters not time, especially in a bug bounty. If you want the stability (and assurance) of actually getting paid reasonsbly and consistently for this you should get a job as a pentester.


That's kind bad - first of all 50$ can be really low depending on the region, but more importantly this disregards the time spend on looking for exploits that don't pan out.

So I would multiply that 50$ by at least 4.

But still like the other said bugs should pay by severity not by time spent.


The researcher would probably get paid even less, if that is the case.

The value of an exploit has nothing to do with the development time.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: