Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Footballers first unionized in 1907 and haven't looked back since

Incorrect, the first footballer's union was from 1898 [1].

> I don't think unionization had any effect on their salaries

Despite the existence of the union, clubs could impose a salary cap on players well into the 1960s, and could trade them like slaves under the "retain-and-transfer" system [2] until the EU forbade that practice in the 1990s [3].

All in all, football is a very bad example for the success of unions. Unions helped jack shit to get players out of an exploitative situation - every improvement was hard-won in courts by individual footballers.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_Footballers%27_Uni...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retain_and_transfer_system

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosman_ruling



The NBPA has overseen a huge increase in NBA player's wages over the past few decades, both at the top and for the average or minimum player. Yes, there's a salary cap, but that actually helps the vast majority of players, because otherwise Lebron would get paid 200M/year and the minimum/average players would get basically nothing, and it also ensures competitiveness.

A salary cap is not a reason unions are bad when the salary cap is 800x the average person's income...


The abolition of the maximum wage was arguably a consequence of organisation by the PFA under Jimmy Hill. I agree that the picture is mixed.


But when Jimmy Hill became secretary the PFA did succeed in vastly improving things early 1960's


> and could trade them like slaves under the "retain-and-transfer"

Don't you see a little bit of an issue with this wording? Namely that said players were paid for their labor and could quit playing football at any time?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: