Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I swear something like 50% of those digests are totally incorrect as well. It's amazing they have kept the feature because it has never had a very high signal-to-noise ratio. I never trust what's presented in these digests without double-checking the source page.


I remember when rich snippets (one type of those widgets) came out there were a lot of funny examples. One for a common query about cancer treatments that pulled data from a dodgy holistic site saying that "carrots cured most types of cancer" (or something like that).

There was a similar one where Google emphatically claimed a US quarter was worth five cents in a pretty and large snippet graphic.


The most memorable rich snippet humor I've seen is a horse breeder sharing a story of how her searches gave snippets with my little ponies as the preview image.


I recall in the last uk election google got the infographic of party leaders about 60-70% wrong.

And quite often a people also ask refine is just some random guys comment from redit.


Have you heard the story of Thomas Running? It’s a story Google will tell you.

(Search who invented running)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: