Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Super neat!

(Small detail: the first 100 hits for ceilings are all _interesting_ ceilings? Nothing like the kind of ceilings usually encountered on a video chat app?)



Why would anyone post something boring on a photography site? There's a bar for quality on flickr; it's not twitter.


Yeah, flickr might not be a good data set to train for boring images. Maybe we need a high quality repository of bad photos.


Of course, the point is that it may not be good data for training a model.


I was clarifying, since the above poster was using question marks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: