It's definitely reasonable; but we are also not explicitly speaking for a corpor...

18pfsmt · on July 1, 2011

The OP was not speaking for a corporation, near as I could tell, but was speaking as a concerned employee. The response from RIMM was equally anonymous, yet it wreaked of the PHB mentality that got RIMM where it is in the first place.

nl · on July 1, 2011

we are also not explicitly speaking for a corporation

Not always the case; eg: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1932272, http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1502909 etc