Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Regulations are like code - buggy and iterative. That's why you need a responsive democracy (which the US decidedly does not have). So when a regulation has bugs, the people can get their representatives to update it.

We don't avoid writing code just because it's inevitably buggy and has unintended side effects. Indeed, there's a whole mentality of "move fast and break things" - essentially damn the side effects and full speed ahead - because we, as a sector, recognize that you have to take risks to make the world a better place. Yet, we forget that when it comes to using government power (our collective power) to make laws that shape our world.

Now, I'm not a proponent of "move fast and break things" - more, move steadily and make the best decision you can in a reasonable time frame. But "move steadily" is still moving. We can take our time writing legislation and regulations and do our best to get it right, and still also work to build responsive systems so that when it's inevitably buggy we can fix the bugs.

As I said in the second sentence, the problem with the US right now is that it was intentionally constructed to be the opposite of a responsive democracy.



Sure, but the first step to evaluating if an idea is "the best decision [we] can [make] in a reasonable time" is to understand what the idea is.

So, per all of my questions, how does this idea work? How is market share defined and measured?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: