Are you arriving at this conclusion from a place of jaded bias or from actual data? Some managers feel that way sure, but your statement implies that its essentially the norm to be expected which is not the case.
Why is this argument so easy to make for politicians that get corrupted by power, but not for managers that might suffer from the exact same human weakness?
> implies that its essentially the norm to be expected which is not the case.
I deliberately chose words which do not draw a conclusion about "the norm" because I, just like you, don't know what that is. There is no such dataset, all anyone can do is assemble anecdotes.
