> Your argumentation is just completely wrong, you think that "significant usage" is some kind of "quality".
Nowhere did I claim that - you're reading things I did not say.
Claiming that something is rejected by everyone does not make any statement on the quality of that thing.
[EDIT: It's kinda common knowledge that Haskell is barely used in industry. I cannot remember coming across a single non-academic programmer in the workplace who actually wanted to use it, other than myself]
Nowhere did I claim that - you're reading things I did not say.
Claiming that something is rejected by everyone does not make any statement on the quality of that thing.
[EDIT: It's kinda common knowledge that Haskell is barely used in industry. I cannot remember coming across a single non-academic programmer in the workplace who actually wanted to use it, other than myself]