>> In particular, it’s completely f...ing useless on classical music.
Almost every bit of music cataloguing software seems to be CFU for classical. It's built around the "album of tracks" model, without any notion of subgroupings (like a filesystem with no subdirectories), or a notion of multiple performers involved.
Now that being said, cataloguing classical recordings is a pain. The least worst way seems to be by ensemble type, for most "reasonable" collections that gets you most of the way. Not to say other genres aren't, just that you often have dumb things that hinder discoverability, eg., the 'filler' piece that screws up the obvious one place to file the disc.
There's a reason why librarianship is a discipline.
> And remember, the ML model is never on your side; its primary agenda is the agenda of whoever paid to have it built.
AGI ads will be wild.
(Hopefully it'll be so good it actually improves my productivity in society and realizes just sucking out my resources via my attention isn't as gainful longer term.)
That sounds like the inverse paperclip problem. Instead of sucking up all resources in the world maximizing for paperclip production, the AGI recurses that out and realizes the end result is no more paperclip production, and chooses something else.
> Maybe it's posted somewhere else where it got more views?
The videos on that channel definitely seem to be reuploads. Not only are they not in chronological order, but they have an upload date of 2020, despite the original crowdfunding campaign (for season 1) promising a DVD release in 2012.
My vote is for the new word.
It would fit "struggle as a side-effect of training."