Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How can they monitor failure rate if they only track failures though?


Why does it have to be a rate? Failures counts and failure types are good enough to extrapolate whatever else you need


They really aren't. If a package is downloaded 100k times and fails 1k times it's a very different issue than if it's downloaded 1k times and fails 1k times.


IMO installation failures are equally bad, no matter if they happen in 1% of cases or in 100%.


Well, you're wrong. If you have 10,000 packages and 1,000 of them are failing it's clearly useful to be able to prioritize which to fix first.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: