> "Emergent" as used here is akin to how physicists use the word. "Emergent" as you interpret it (with the implication of something deeper) is more akin to how philosophers use the word.
No, if you had read even the first paragraph of the article, you'd have seen that the person you're responding to isn't "interpreting" the article, they're quoting the article.
Don't correct people when you don't know what you're talking about. You haven't read the article so you're in no position to talk about the article.
This is the level of discussion I've come to expect from Hacker News, unfortunately.
No, if you had read even the first paragraph of the article, you'd have seen that the person you're responding to isn't "interpreting" the article, they're quoting the article.
Don't correct people when you don't know what you're talking about. You haven't read the article so you're in no position to talk about the article.
This is the level of discussion I've come to expect from Hacker News, unfortunately.