> Generalizations about country/etymology shouldn't qualify to be up-voted in HN, please.
What country? (and what does etymology have to do with the whole mess?) He said not to do business with a private company, ranted at lengths on the subject and clearly explained that the issue was solely HR/business and that his relations with the engineering side had been nothing but good?
What generalization are you talking about?
> The victim's explanations are usually generalizations and overreactions, in rare cases I've seen people reacting accordingly.
Considering PPK's history of not being a sanguine lad, the mere fact that they got him to react to such length, on a former business partner, is a huge red flag with warning sirens.
> You can be harsh when the situation requires it.
I'm guessing he thought the situation did require it.
> As long as all you loose is time, you can tell that you're enriched by another experience that will guide you in your next project into a better management.
What country? (and what does etymology have to do with the whole mess?) He said not to do business with a private company, ranted at lengths on the subject and clearly explained that the issue was solely HR/business and that his relations with the engineering side had been nothing but good?
What generalization are you talking about?
> The victim's explanations are usually generalizations and overreactions, in rare cases I've seen people reacting accordingly.
Considering PPK's history of not being a sanguine lad, the mere fact that they got him to react to such length, on a former business partner, is a huge red flag with warning sirens.
> You can be harsh when the situation requires it.
I'm guessing he thought the situation did require it.
> As long as all you loose is time, you can tell that you're enriched by another experience that will guide you in your next project into a better management.
You're joking right?