Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The author doesn't appear to even consider any kind of obligation to their users.


I'm sorry you feel that way. The primary intention of writing this article was to discuss it from the perspective of a 'failed product,' so I didn't mention my personal feelings. I am also aware of the potential harm it could cause to users, which is why I don't resent OpenAI's review process. I hope that during the period without review, it didn't cause any psychological harm to users.


>so I didn't mention my personal feelings

That's a strange comment. The article is full of your personal feelings.

> But this paper gave me a different feeling,

> And I personally prefer subscription

> I don’t dislike this, as it aligns with human nature.

> However, I started to feel a sense of loss...what real significance did it hold for me?

> This further disheartened me,

> Reluctantly, I had to abandon the idea.


This is a 'failed product' with a massive ethical dimension; not considering that, or relying only on hope, is negligent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: