Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So he flew in from out-of-state, gave disposition next day, and magically got a gun bypassing 5-day wait period.

Mmmmmm. You don't even need the help of Occam's Razor here.



> So he flew in from out-of-state

Did he? I haven't seen any citation of his travel itinerary. Also, you can fly with a gun in checked luggage in the US

> gave disposition next day

TFA mentions his disposition "last week"

> magically got a gun bypassing 5-day wait period.

This is South Carolina. SC has no waiting period.


So he got his handgun despite South Carolina's lack of reciprocity with his native Washington state.

Same article mentioned disposition next day, so you think he stayed two weeks at the seedy motel? I say he went back home between dispos.

So he skated background check after three days of non-response from ATF which automatically allows him to secure his firearm purchase?


> So he got his handgun

Was it a handgun? I haven't seen weapon type reported anywhere.

> despite South Carolina's lack of reciprocity

There are no gun transactions in SC that require a carry license. Guns can also be transported on airplanes without carry licenses. They can also generally be transported via car without a license.

> with his native Washington state.

He is a Louisiana resident.

> so you think he stayed two weeks

I don't know how long he was there, but it doesn't matter. Not only is there is no waiting period for buying a gun in SC, he could have brought one with him on his trip.

> at the seedy motel?

It was a Holiday Inn, which is a hotel and is typically 3-star.

> I say he went back home between dispos.

Does a source say that, or are you making it up?

> So he skated background check after three days of non-response from ATF which automatically allows him to secure his firearm purchase?

NICS typically takes a couple of minutes to process. In SC, like the vast majority of the US, a firearm purchase takes 30 minutes or less.



Imagine thinking it's normal for him to bring a gun to a deposition meeting.


Never let pesky little facts get in the way of a good conspiracy!


Occam's razor says you should not multiple entities beyond what is necessary.

Our scenario is this: There's a guy in a vehicle. He is holding a gun. He has a gunshot wound. He has been under a lot of stress.

Explanation 1: The guy shot himself. Number of entities (people) required: 1

Explanation 2: Someone else shot the guy and staged the scene to look like a suicide. Number of entities (people) required: 2

Occam's razor says suicide is the most likely explanation


Source on Occam's razor being anything more than a philosophical framework? Kind of silly to even bring that up in this scenario without looking at the possible motivations or lack thereof.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/boeing-whistleblower-wa...


None. Did I imply that it’s something else?


I would agree, except it is not some random average guy in a vehicle.

This was a concern citizen, who was a whistleblower against his employer, who had just begun a legal deposition, and there are billions of dollars at stake.

So - the scenario possibly just isn't that simple.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: