No, but if you buy a car it's not unreasonable to expect to have a functional car you can drive for 5 years. If your car turns out to be a lemon and you want to sell it in the first year... well, that's a shitty situation regardless of "financial investments"
this is an extremely stupid position - why on earth do you feel there is some vague right to offload your shitty car on to someone else for about what you paid for it?
This is not about investement. This is about getting what you paid for.
It seems such companies cannot be trusted by looking in their beautiful big blue eyes. Who would have thought?
Nowadays if something you want to purchase (software, hardware, car, rocket ship, zen garden, whatever) "promises" to have certain features and functionality, you have to check thoroughly before buying into it.
If the car really is unfit for purpose, then the resale value is irrelevant - the manufacturer has to take it back and exchange it for a working car or refund it. But it's unlikely they'll do it without a lawsuit. (I also find the idea of trying to offload your non-working car on someone foolish enough to buy it on the resale market unethical.)
My best guess is that their expectation of capabilities the car is nowhere near what the company actually deliverd. They were promised things within a certain future timeframe and the company did not produce these things within that certain timeframe.
If you buy new, get one ready off the shelf. If you order and features are scrapped before delivery you usually will simply not get them as the contract states they might alter them at any time. One of the reasons to never buy new.
None at all. I sold mine for less than it was worth to pay it forward to the next generation of pizza guy. I did so after it got me out of where I was from on my way to where and whom I am today. I'm confident it did the same thing for that next pizza guy.
For the right people, these things are tools, not financial burdens.
Leasing a new BMW, now that's definitely a financial burden and is not this.
It seems to me that the right move here is to buy not one, but two Fisker Oceans from the used market: one for daily use and another for spare parts. This will cost only $42k, which is still 40% cheaper than one new.
MIPS has been bankrupt multiple times and is now defunct but I still buy routers with their chips in them.
The problem with current EVs is that they're smartphones with wheels. Only the manufacturer can service them. So you can't buy their product without betting on the company's future like you can with, say, an open-architecture general-purpose computer (those are getting rarer too).
Bring back the original Tesla Roadster and Nissan Leaf.
Isn’t the appraisal offer they got an actual real offer to buy the car right there on the spot for cash from the appraisal company? If that’s the case then it’s not really a fair offer. It’s an offer the appraisal company is confident it can safely make a profit on through subsequent resale.
It was only ever worth 21K to begin with and the real trick was convincing you otherwise.
See, cars have been in a bubble for the last 8 years because a negative real interest rate drove the existence of $70K SUVs/trucks and $40K cars in the first place. Which is why used cars sometimes exceed the price of new cars, and why people expect minimal depreciation from new vehicles today.
And sure, I'd buy a Fisker Ocean for 21,000 dollars; parts aren't going to be a concern because all the EV fans tell me they're basically maintenance free and will definitely never need soon-to-be-unobtanium suspension parts (which aren't really wear parts in the same way tires and brakes are) or a fix for that tilting screen gimmick.
While I am sure the overall narrative is accurate, appraisals tend to be less accurate when there are few transactions occurring for a product. I imagine the appraiser had a hell of a time assigning any value (including $0) to much of the car.
Just open-source the firmware. I'm sure someone will make a project to add 150% of advertised features, and the kitchen sink. And then possibly apply it to other cars, like it happend with DD-WRT.
Searching AutoTrader here in the UK sadly has lower spec models than this at > £50k. If you actually could buy this spec for $21k I'd be first in the queue.
Hard pass. You will likely need ongoing support from the manufacturer. A Tesla is probably not indefinitely supported and might need security and other updates to properly function, for remote operations, navigation, entertainment etc.
So it depreciated by maybe $20k extra, and their advice is not to buy such a car. Bad advice. "past performance is no guarantee of future results" and definitely not after such a drop. A price that starts at $69k can't drop by $20k very many times: $0 is a hard limit and even twice is difficult to believe.
I think the key issue is that when the OEM doesn't exist, software issues can likely never be fixed, and might make the car undrivable.
For example, imagine the root filesystem of the infotainment system gets full with logs. Now it won't boot. But that system uses secure boot/disk encryption so you can't go in and fix it. And btw, the infotainment not working means the car can't be shifted into drive.
No mechanic can fix that. The security features mean the parts can't be swapped from one car to another, and besides, even if you could do swaps, any swapped unit will get the same fault as the first.
That is why the car valuation has dropped so much. The high chance that within a few years it becomes undrivable and unfixable.
Have you seen the new video that went up yesterday? He reviewed the 2.0 software. Some stuff was fixed, but a lot still left on the table.
Unfortunately, Fisker kinda screwed themselves when they broke OTA updates for v1 cars. Maybe they could have gotten themselves out of the media black hole a bit better if they could push fixes without requiring a technician.
