I find it to be the most common view of people who aren't that involved, monetarily or emotionally, with the AI industry and especially among people who aren't that involved with the software industry in general.
Here on HN, the people who think that this stuff is the start of some sort of whole new world are overrepresented, as we would expect. HN readers tend to be a fairly specialized subset of even the software industry.
> why is it to obvious there's a new amazing version around the corner
I'm not sure what your question is here. Are you asking why it's obvious, or why it's not obvious? My bias is that I don't see much reason to think that LLMs are on the edge of some kind of massive leap into AGI, let alone a "superintelligence".
Here on HN, the people who think that this stuff is the start of some sort of whole new world are overrepresented, as we would expect. HN readers tend to be a fairly specialized subset of even the software industry.
> why is it to obvious there's a new amazing version around the corner
I'm not sure what your question is here. Are you asking why it's obvious, or why it's not obvious? My bias is that I don't see much reason to think that LLMs are on the edge of some kind of massive leap into AGI, let alone a "superintelligence".