> Based purely on the responses, who would you hire? Who would you consider for a manager role? Do you even believe this is the same person?
Frankly, neither.
The first is intentionally written to be as dull and disinterested as possible, and so comes off poorly (presumably because it was designed to).
The second is a meaningless out-of-context number and corporate speak soup that doesn't really tell me anything about the prospective hire.
Obviously, this was written by and for executives in product orgs... and maybe it makes more sense there. But I'd balk at hiring anyone who talks like this into an engineering org, even at the executive level.
Frankly, neither.
The first is intentionally written to be as dull and disinterested as possible, and so comes off poorly (presumably because it was designed to).
The second is a meaningless out-of-context number and corporate speak soup that doesn't really tell me anything about the prospective hire.
Obviously, this was written by and for executives in product orgs... and maybe it makes more sense there. But I'd balk at hiring anyone who talks like this into an engineering org, even at the executive level.