Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The linked document connects their work to physics as follows:

"The Hopfeld network utilises physics that describes a material’s characteristics due to its atomic spin – a property that makes each atom a tiny magnet. The network as a whole is described in a manner equivalent to the energy in the spin system found in physics, and is trained by fnding values for the connections between the nodes so that the saved images have low energy"

"Hinton used tools from statistical physics, the science of systems built from many similar components."



Then it should be awarded for the result.

Given the line of reasoning this has now opened up Alan Turing should be awarded one posthumously in every field.


He unironically should


100% agreed as I can't think of any one individual since(1) who has done as much for all of science and engineering as he ultimately did; alas, they are not awarded posthumously.

(1) Newton would be a strong contender on a "for all time" basis, but even he would've probably needed to share it with Leibniz, which would have driven him absolutely ~b o n k e r s~, like wet hornet in a hot outhouse mad, LOL.


von Neumann probably


> probably needed to share it with Leibniz

For Physics?


Neither of these models were never really influential though beyond some theoretical niches.


Yup. This prize is indistinguishable from "we saw AI in all the headlines, let's see what's the most plausible reasons we could hand it out for that"


It seems like a hallucination generated from a ChatGPT prompt...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: