I guess your point is that it's obvious, but I'd argue it's not.
A lot of people are hyping up LLMs as the solution to all our problems, and there have been a lot of discussion around what's reasonable use cases (and a lot of anecdotal evidence trying to argue and support certain stances). My point is that we need (scientific) proof to move forward, and create confidence in "facts" we base our decisions on. Obviously that doesn't seem to be very fashionable nowadays - on both sides of the LLM discussion there seems to be a lot of people arguing hard for there stances. I'm very glad some are working on providing some facts into this discussion.
(one can argue about science vs truth, but regardless it's a step in the right direction/a good motive)
(this is btw why a solid educational foundation, not only skill focused, is very critical for society. cf democracy)
A lot of people are hyping up LLMs as the solution to all our problems, and there have been a lot of discussion around what's reasonable use cases (and a lot of anecdotal evidence trying to argue and support certain stances). My point is that we need (scientific) proof to move forward, and create confidence in "facts" we base our decisions on. Obviously that doesn't seem to be very fashionable nowadays - on both sides of the LLM discussion there seems to be a lot of people arguing hard for there stances. I'm very glad some are working on providing some facts into this discussion.
(one can argue about science vs truth, but regardless it's a step in the right direction/a good motive)
(this is btw why a solid educational foundation, not only skill focused, is very critical for society. cf democracy)