> At the same time, part of the scientific community continues to diminish what was accomplished
Revisit the idea: part of the public is bewildered by voices that started calling "intelligence" what was and apparently still is the precise implementation of unintelligence. The fault is in some, many people - as usual.
Very recent state-of-the-art LLM models themselves declare that if the majority of their training data states that entity E is red they will say it's red, and if the majority says it's blue then they will say it's blue: that is the implementation of an artificial moron.
And in fact, very recent state-of-the-art LLM models state cretinous ideas that are child level - because "that's what they have heard" (stuck, moreover analytically, in the simplifications intrinsic in expression).
This architectural fault should be the foremost concern.
Revisit the idea: part of the public is bewildered by voices that started calling "intelligence" what was and apparently still is the precise implementation of unintelligence. The fault is in some, many people - as usual.
Very recent state-of-the-art LLM models themselves declare that if the majority of their training data states that entity E is red they will say it's red, and if the majority says it's blue then they will say it's blue: that is the implementation of an artificial moron.
And in fact, very recent state-of-the-art LLM models state cretinous ideas that are child level - because "that's what they have heard" (stuck, moreover analytically, in the simplifications intrinsic in expression).
This architectural fault should be the foremost concern.