I'm pretty sure Zed knows Ruby quite well. FWIW, `for .. in` is syntactic sugar ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		jamesbritt on Aug 19, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Programming Languages Have Social Mores Not Idioms I'm pretty sure Zed knows Ruby quite well. FWIW, `for .. in` is syntactic sugar over `each`

kenko on Aug 19, 2012 | [–]

So in order to each `for ... in`, should you have to teach Enumerable, etc?

Apocryphon on Aug 19, 2012 | [–]

He also knows the community quite well, as well.

jamesbritt on Aug 19, 2012 | [–]

Well, there is no monolithic Ruby community.

There are many.

Some are bigger/louder than others.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact