That sounds like a personal problem. Your brain can't possibly handle anywhere near the amount of information 101 tabs provides at once, there's no reason to do that.
I use tabs like bookmarks - sites that I might need now or a bit later. I GC them from time to time. Actual bookmarks are used for things like sending a link to myself at home using firefox sync or bookmarking sites I need to visit again and again, like docs sites, the internal bugtracker, etc. I don't open those from the bookmarks menu though, I just type in the awesome bar and firefox always shows bookmarks first, i.e. I use bookmarks as a manual way to bubble up search results in the awesome bar.
I use tabs like this too and I'm not really happy about that, I just haven't found a better alternative yet.
What usually happens is I'll be browsing and find an article/code library/inspiring web design/useful tool that I know I can make use of later in some way, but if I just bookmark it then I'll probably forget it's in there.
I have very organised bookmarks but these only work for sites I visit often and I do use tools like Evernote and Gimmebar but it still doesn't feel right.
I too browse this way, and it's not about processing all the content at once. It's about utilizing the browser's ability to remember things you can't, and establishing a workflow as you move through the tabs.
I have forum threads, stackoverflow tags, manuals, ... opened. Not exactly a read later list, although I do use tabs for that as well. I use bookmarks for things I want to save for later. Usually something I've already read (at least partially) to know it's worth saving. (I know a bookmark folder/tag would be enough)
I always hold at least two digits' worth of tabs open, usually grouped into stacks. For instance, I have a stack of music/radio related tabs (e.g. youtube), several stacks with documentation that I infrequently need, stacks with tabs that I will read sometime later in the week/month/year, stacks related to various issues in the code I am working on, and so on.
I can't be bothered to use bookmarks for these things, having tabs in stacks is much more convenient. If the browser lets me keep a lot of tabs open then I'll abuse this posibility for my personal comfort.
If we were to use your philosophy then Chrome should be limited to a certain amount of tabs by design. How about 6, the number of cores in my CPU?
But thank you for the diagnosis dr. Jobs, surely I'm holding the phone the wrong way too. Keep blaming the user.
It's not blaming the user. The user in this case is using the browser in an unintended way. It it therefore the users' own fault if the browser doesn't hold up.
If I want to ride my bike facing the wrong direction, it's not the fault of the designer that I can no longer steer. I could potentially make it work, but would it ever be reasonable for the manufacturer to add another set of handlebars on the back?
As for your comment about Apple claiming the user was holding their phone incorrectly, they did ultimately provide cases right and therefore admitting that enough users were having trouble to merit a change / fix ?
All said, you are using your browser wrong. Sorry to be the one who has to tell you.
That's a poor analogy. The situation of using so many tabs is about making the browser work harder, not in an incorrect manner. So if I was to compare that to riding a bike it would be like pedaling as fast as I could. If the bike couldn't handle it then yes, I would say it was the manufacturers fault.
The fact is the Chrome efficiently runs many tabs. This guy wants an extreme use case to be primarily supported or the browser must suck.
Supporting it would be a waste of developer time. If they run out of ways to make Chrome faster and have nothing better to do then sure, let's deal with this niche problem.
