Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But why should I have to install an addon? This is something already built in to the browser, in all honesty, if you removed a feature I used frequently then told me to go elsewhere to re-download it, I would be going elsewhere to download some software and the software would be Google Chrome.


You already know why it should be in an add-on: because your use case is a rare one, and rare features for particular audiences don't belong in the main browser UI.

There are some fields where "But it's traditional," is a reasonable response to a proposed change. But software isn't really one of them.


I'd like to know on where the notion that removing features used by only a fraction of the user base is what should be done comes from ?

It is brandished right and left as if obvious, but it is never explained.


Consider all the possible features that 1% of the userbase wants. Are you saying they all should be included?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: