Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How big is your database? Why are you not keeping it in memory? Was this an actual, real bottleneck? How many servers do you currently rent?


SSDs are cheaper than RAM. I'm not keeping a 1TB database in memory.


How about SAP HANA? They keep 100TB in memory...

They have startup program: http://www.saphana.com/community/learn/startups


I've used SAP HANA and it's a fantastic piece of software arguably the best SQL database on the market today.

It also costs an absolute fortune (only approved hardware allowed) and even the AWS instance which costs $3.50/hour is not certified for production deployments. I don't know many startups who can afford $5000 a month for minimum redundancy.


That's not an option for me, my database is more than 20G.


32GB of RAM is $220 on Newegg.



Preach!


DB in RAM still requires to write to disk, which is often the bottleneck, not the reads.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: