Who says he has to? I don't agree with the notion that reporters are supposed to blandly report both sides of the issue and ignore their own views, nor do I think that leads to a more accurate representation of reality. I mean, when you see an article about a serial murder, does it include something like "Serial murder supporters claim that murder prevents overpopulation"?
Ok, I didn't explain myself good enough. Of course he doesn't have to, he can write what he wants, and I also don't say he is wrong. I just wanted to say that I miss other points of view in this story.
